“Dollhouse” and The Problem with U.S.-Style TV

DollhouseIf you fear spoilers on 5-year old TV shows, boy are you in the wrong place.

About five years late to the party, I started watching Dollhouse on Netflix recently out of curiosity. I remember the show, vaguely, from it’s run on broadcast TV, recalled the slight buzz about the unaired season 1 finale, so I tuned in. I often watch stuff out of morbid curiosity: Canceled shows, films with record low Tomatometer rankings, that sort of thing.

Dollhouse, for those who don’t share my morbid curiosity about failed pop culture, is a Joss Whedon show developed around the concept of “imprinting” personalities on people. The titular “dolls” are volunteers (mostly) who sign a 5-year contract, have their own personalities removed, and spend their time being imprinted with whatever the clients need them to be. Sometimes it’s a security expert. Sometimes a secret agent. Usually, the show implies very heavily, it’s a sex toy.

The show starts off a little rough with some really, really bad stories involving reasons to get Eliza Dushku into skimpy outfits. Slowly, the over-arching story arc asserts itself: The “doll” technology is getting out of hand, and that unaired final episode of season 1 makes it very clear: The “doll” technology is going to end the world as we know it.

Dollhouse as it ended up – 26 episodes – is a hot mess. But there’s a really, really great story in there that would have worked incredibly well in a British-style short-run of maybe 10-12 episodes.

The American ModelĀ  = Doom

To be fair, you can almost see (and Whedon has said as much) how Dollhouse got sold: Eliza Dushku in hot outfits, engaged in a new Charlie’s Angel-esque adventure every week, but with a Sci-Fi glamour about it. The first few episodes are pretty much this, and they’re awful. Whedon actually started to say publicly that people should stick around for episode 6 of the first season because that’s where he thought he began to assert the type of show he really wanted to make – and it shows.

A lot of Dollhouse is this awful filler, with the “dolls” instantly transformed into spies, backup dancers, fancy prostitutes, and other fairly dull ideas. The true joy of this series is in the back story and the arc, which details how the technology became mobile and broadcastable – meaning you could “imprint” someone over the phone, essentially – and how that basically allowed the rich and powerful to live forever by snatching other bodies, and how that basically led to the total breakdown of society and the end of civilization.

That story is pretty damn good.

The other aspects of the show that work are where the basic premise of imprinting someone is explored in more interesting ways. When a Doll is imprinted with a recently murdered woman who then investigates her own murder. When a major character on the show is revealed to have been a Doll who wasn’t aware of her status – who thought she was real, and her reaction to this knowledge is explored.

But mainly, it’s the end-of-the-world stuff that grabbed me. Cut away about 50% of the episodes, and you’d have a pretty tight British-style show that told an interesting Sci-Fi story. And you’d still have plenty of opportunities to put Dushku into miniskirts and have her shake her ass a little.

That’s the problem with American-style TV: The goal is always infinite episodes, or at least 100 episodes and syndication. This automatically lends itself to padding, filler, and awful plot decisions. In fact, I’d say that the fact that Dollhouse was pretty much always in danger of being cancelled at any time is likely why so much of it actually works – because Whedon was forced to always be thinking hard about getting his story goals accomplished. I can picture him madly typing away in some smoke-filled office, trying desperately to get to a denouement before FOX canceled his ass.

Is Dollhouse great TV? Not really. But it might have been, if they weren’t shooting for infinite episodes. Now that we’re moving into an era when a show like Dollhouse, with its traditionally puny 26 episodes – along with popular British fare like Sherlock, Luther, and The Fall – can be successful on Netflix, or Amazon, or Hulu, maybe we’ll see more experimentation this way, and more shows modeled on a shorter run, with less filler. And that would be awesome.

 

4 Comments

  1. Jason Falter

    I’d love it if the standard season was 13 episodes. 22 – 24 episodes wears a person down and as you said, lots of filler that could be easily edited out. I think the recent 24 proved this, even the producer stated that half of the original episodes in a full 24 (24 ep season) were unneeded filler. Even sitcoms would be better at the 13 episode mark. With so much media/ interactive media I’ve been trying to cut out some programming to make room for others that can be viewed in marathon style or with shorter seasons.

  2. jsomers (Post author)

    Jason – yup, exactly. Tighten everything up. This isn’t 1979 and we’re not watching Charlie’s Angels any more – ‘prestige’ shows get a lot less prestigious when they’re filled with crap.

  3. DeadlyAccurate

    This, so much. 10-15 is the sweet spot for a series for me. My favorite shows run about 13 episodes. The writers have more time to write stronger episodes, and the actors and behind-the-scenes staff aren’t as beat down by a schedule that requires them to cram. And they have more time to redo scenes that don’t work instead of having to say, “Eh, good enough,” and move on.

    I’d also like to see more shows have a set lifespan, say of 3 – 5 seasons, with the entire overarching plot (if there is one) already done. That would minimize the number of shows that turn out like Lost or Alias.

  4. Jason Falter

    Alias had a set 5 year arc from day 1 (I have to respond to that one because Alias is and will always be my favorite show) and it ended perfectly. Lost… well.. they didn’t know what they were doing. I only watched Lost because Alias was so good, after the Lost conclusion, I felt like I had wasted so much time on it. J.J. jumped ship on the show after the first season when it came to actual writing duties and Lindelof was the man… the man who writes with big splashy plot holes EVERYWHERE. Case in point: Prometheus.
    I do agree on a set season number. Even for sitcoms. I have been a fan of The Big Bang Theory forever but even I am getting a little worn out on that one… They got upped for 3 more years too. Their “geekdom” is starting to take a back seat to their aging though.
    I think NBC is doing it right with Hannibal and whatever else occupies that spot for the first half of the season (last year Dracula (not so good) this year Constantine (hopefully really good)). Then you get 13 of Constantine followed by 13 of Hannibal which both run after an already established and excellent Grimm. It’s a good combination and game plan. And Hannibal has a 5 year arc planned to incorporate the movies IF they can get rights from the movie studios for Clarice.
    Shorter seasons also make for complete weekly watching without that winter break that always breaks up the season. Although, writers and producers are starting to love that mid-season cliff hanger.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.